Exhibit 545 ยท Journal investigation
The scientific report guiding the US dietary guidelines: is it scientific? (BMJ 2015;351:h4962)
The expert report underpinning the next set of US Dietary Guidelines for Americans fails to reflect much relevant scientific literature in its reviews of crucial topics and therefore risks giving a misleading picture, an investigation by The BMJ has found.
BMJ investigation criticizing the DGAC's evidence methods, its use of the Nutrition Evidence Library and its saturated-fat and red-meat conclusions. Competing-interests note: Teicholz is a board member of the Nutrition Coalition, and the article was 'fully funded with a grant from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation.' The copy carries an amendment note about reference URLs; the 29 September clarification, the October correction and the committee's rapid response are in the Retraction Watch exhibits.
- Source
- Nina Teicholz, The BMJ
- Date
- 23 September 2015
- Quoted from
- BMJ 2015;351:h4962, published 23 Sept. 2015, lede paragraph, p. 1 of the 6-page PDF (Wayback copy of bmj.com PDF, snapshot 2026-05-02)
- Grade
- Reported
- Document
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4962
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit