The Lacuna Project

lacuna (n.) a gap in a record where something should be

Independent research. Not affiliated with any government, agency, or company.

Exhibit 090

Selective publication of antidepressant trials, newer drugs: follow-up comparison with FDA records

Exhibit 090 ยท Record comparison and meta-analysis

Selective publication of antidepressant trials, newer drugs: follow-up comparison with FDA records

Within negative trials, transparent reporting increased from 11% to 47%.

Examined 30 trials of four newer antidepressants (13,747 participants). All 15 FDA-positive trials were transparently published. Of 15 negative trials, seven were transparently published, six were unpublished and two were presented as positive. Transparent publication of negative trials rose from 11% in the authors' older comparison to 47%. Standardized effect size was 0.24 in FDA records and 0.29 in journals. The study covered efficacy outcomes and a small drug sample; it did not establish equivalent improvement in safety reporting.

Source
Turner et al., PLOS Medicine
Date
2022
Quoted from
Abstract-level summary (Methods and findings), PLOS Medicine 2022
Grade
Peer-reviewed
Document
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003886
Accessed
2026-11-09
Cited by
Findings citing this exhibit

Cited by

Finding MED-4.1
Peer-reviewed The FDA judged 38 of 74 antidepressant trials (51 percent) positive. In the published literature, 48 of 51 trials (94 percent) appeared positive.