The Lacuna Project

lacuna (n.) a gap in a record where something should be

Independent research. Not affiliated with any government, agency, or company.

Exhibit 917

Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, Sotomayor dissent

Exhibit 917 ยท Court opinion

Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, Sotomayor dissent

Today, the Court holds that reporting and disclosure requirements must be narrowly tailored even if a plaintiff demonstrates no burden at all.

Dissent of Justices Sotomayor, Breyer, Kagan.

Source
U.S. Supreme Court
Date
1 July 2021
Quoted from
Sotomayor, J., dissenting, first paragraph
Grade
Primary record
Document
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-251_p86b.pdf
Accessed
2026-11-10
Cited by
Findings citing this exhibit

Cited by

Finding POL-5.14
Primary record In NAACP v. Alabama (1958) the Supreme Court unanimously held compelled production of the NAACP's membership lists unconstitutional on an uncontroverted showing of reprisals against members. In Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (2021) the Court held, 6 to 3 on the judgment, that California's collection of charities' Schedule B donor lists was not narrowly tailored; Bonta concerned state collection from 501(c)(3) charities and did not concern federal campaign disclosure.