The Lacuna Project

lacuna (n.) a gap in a record where something should be

Independent research. Not affiliated with any government, agency, or company.

Exhibit 1140

Letter from Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (House Judiciary Committee Democrats) to YouTube CEO Neal Mohan

Exhibit 1140 · Congressional letter

Letter from Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (House Judiciary Committee Democrats) to YouTube CEO Neal Mohan

Yet this belated confession is impossible to square with the detailed testimony of 20 Alphabet employees, who all explained, under penalty of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for False Statements to Congress, that the Biden Administration never sought to force YouTube to remove content.

The minority's response to the Alphabet letter. It says the committee interviewed 20 Alphabet employees and that 'not a single one' testified about coercion or undue pressure from the Biden administration, quotes a June 2025 exchange with a YouTube vice president of product management, and asks what Alphabet was 'promised or threatened with' before sending the letter. It lists 2025 settlements between the administration's targets and the president as context. The letter characterizes transcripts that are not public; the question about promises or threats is a question, not a finding.

Source
House Committee on the Judiciary, Democratic staff (Ranking Member Jamie Raskin)
Date
30 October 2025
Quoted from
Letter, p. 1
Grade
Primary record
Document
https://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/democrats-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2025-10-30-raskin-to-mohan-youtube-re-coercion-1.pdf
Accessed
2026-11-10
Cited by
Findings citing this exhibit
Note
Reported as to the transcripts: the 20 interview transcripts were not opened. Replace with the transcripts if the Committee releases them.

Cited by

Finding INF-4.5
Primary record Meta (26 August 2024) and Alphabet (23 September 2025) each wrote to the House Judiciary Committee that senior Biden administration officials pressed them in 2021 over COVID-19 content, and each wrote that the company made its own decisions on removal and enforcement.