The Lacuna Project

lacuna (n.) a gap in a record where something should be

Independent research. Not affiliated with any government, agency, or company.

Exhibit 1021

The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era

Exhibit 1021 · Peer-reviewed study

The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era

Combined, the top five most prolific publishers account for more than 50% of all papers published in 2013.

Analysis of 45 million documents indexed in the Web of Science, 1973-2013, assigning journals to publishers by the publisher, city and country recorded for each issue and tracking mergers and acquisitions. Natural and medical sciences: the five largest publishers held little more than 20% of papers in 1973 and 53% in 2013. Social sciences and humanities: under 10% through 1990 and over 51% in 2013. Social sciences alone reach 70% from the top five; humanities stay near 20%. Reed-Elsevier 24.1%, Springer 11.9% and Wiley-Blackwell 11.3% of natural and medical science papers in 2013. Coverage is limited to journals indexed in the Web of Science.

Source
Larivière, Haustein and Mongeon, PLOS ONE 10(6): e0127502
Date
10 June 2015
Quoted from
Abstract
Grade
Peer-reviewed
Document
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
Accessed
2026-11-10
Cited by
Findings citing this exhibit

Cited by

Finding INF-3.1
Peer-reviewed Five publishers produced more than half of all papers indexed in the Web of Science in 2013, up from about one-fifth in the natural and medical sciences in 1973.