The Lacuna Project

lacuna (n.) a gap in a record where something should be

Independent research. Not affiliated with any government, agency, or company.

Exhibit 181

The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care

Exhibit 181 · Peer-reviewed cohort study

The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care

Medicare enrollees in higher-spending regions receive more care than those in lower-spending regions but do not have better health outcomes or satisfaction with care.

Same cohorts as Part 1 (hip fracture 614,503; colorectal cancer 195,429; acute myocardial infarction 159,393; survey sample 18,190). Each 10 percent increase in regional end-of-life spending was associated with a five-year relative risk of death of 1.003 (hip fracture), 1.012 (colorectal cancer, CI 1.004–1.019), 1.007 (myocardial infarction, CI 1.001–1.014) and 1.01 (survey sample). Functional decline and satisfaction did not differ consistently. Higher-spending regions did not have better outcomes or satisfaction.

Source
Fisher et al., Annals of Internal Medicine 138(4):288–298
Date
18 February 2003
Quoted from
Abstract, Conclusions (Ann Intern Med 138(4):288-298)
Grade
Peer-reviewed
Document
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-4-200302180-00007
Accessed
2026-11-09
Cited by
Findings citing this exhibit

Cited by

Finding MED-9.7
Peer-reviewed Medicare patients in the highest-spending regions received about 60 percent more care and had no better survival, quality of care, access or satisfaction.