Exhibit 572 · CRS report
Food Additives and GRAS Substances: A Legal Framework (CRS Legal Sidebar LSB11445)
The preamble to the proposed regulations indicates that FDA would consider the failure to submit a GRAS notice as “a factor” in FDA’s prioritization of food substances for post-market review, and therefore marketed substances that are not the subject of a GRAS notice may face increased scrutiny from FDA.
Explains the statutory framework, FDA's 2016 statement that it lacks express authority to require notices, the unsuccessful challenge to the 2016 rule by the Center for Food Safety and the Environmental Defense Fund in the Southern District of New York (decided under Chevron, not appealed), the 2026 proposal, and how Loper Bright could change review of a final rule. Lists four pending bills.
- Source
- Congressional Research Service
- Date
- 5 October 2026
- Quoted from
- p. 4
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/2026-10-05_LSB11445_224683c645df03271d453db38ec195f31490e3cf.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
- Note
- Also p. 3-4: companies 'would be able to market products containing GRAS substances before submitting the notice and while FDA is reviewing the notice.' The Southern District case is named Center for Food Safety v. Becerra; docket number and decision date are not given in the Sidebar.