Covert Action and Accountability
Abstract
Between 1976 and 2016 Senate committees, an independent counsel and the CIA Inspector General documented covert action carried out in secret by the FBI, the CIA and the executive branch. The Church Committee found that the FBI approved 2,370 actions against domestic targets, and Congress responded with permanent intelligence committees and a surveillance court. The Iran/contra prosecutions charged 14 people, convicted 11, and ended with presidential pardons and two vacated convictions. Inquiries into Contra drug trafficking and the BCCI bank found documented failures. The Kerry subcommittee did not find Contra leaders personally involved in trafficking, and the CIA Inspector General found no information that the CIA conspired in it. Part Four of the 2002 Joint Inquiry report, held back until 2016, states leads about Saudi-linked contacts and no final determinations. The 9/11 Commission found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution funded al Qaeda, and a 2005 FBI–CIA assessment found no evidence that the Saudi government knowingly supported the attacks. No cited record implicates the U.S. government in the attacks.
6.1 What the Church Committee found
The Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations, known as the Church Committee, began work in January 1975 and published its final report in April 1976. Its Book III staff study reviewed more than 20,000 pages of FBI documents on the Bureau's counterintelligence programs, called COINTELPRO.
The Church Committee found that the FBI ran five COINTELPRO programs from 1956 to 1971 and approved 2,370 actions to "disrupt" and "neutralize" domestic groups and individuals, among them the November 1964 anonymous note to Martin Luther King Jr.
The staff study counts five domestic programs between 1956 and 1971, beginning with a program against the Communist Party. It states that in these programs "the Bureau went beyond the collection of intelligence to secret action designed to 'disrupt' and 'neutralize' target groups and individuals" (Book III, COINTELPRO report, Part I, p. 3).
Evidence: Exhibit 299, Exhibit 300, Exhibit 301
Mechanism: Known inside, disclosed late
Exhibit 299 · Congressional report
COINTELPRO: The FBI's Covert Action Programs Against American Citizens (Church Committee, Book III)
In these programs, the Bureau went beyond the collection of intelligence to secret action designed to "disrupt" and "neutralize" target groups and individuals.
Staff study of more than 20,000 pages of FBI documents. Records five domestic programs (1956-71), 2,370 approved actions, the August 1967 and March 1968 Black Nationalist directives, and that no one outside the Bureau was informed of three of the programs.
- Source
- United States Senate, Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations
- Date
- 23 April 1976
- Quoted from
- Book III, COINTELPRO report, Part I, p. 3 (PDF p. 7)
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/sites-default-files-94755-iii.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
On 25 August 1967 FBI headquarters instructed 23 field offices to open a program against black nationalist groups. The Committee quotes the letter as directing the field to "expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize" the activities of those organizations, their leadership, spokesmen, membership and supporters (Book III, Part II.B.5, p. 20). A letter of March 1968 listed the prevention of the rise of a "messiah" among the goals. The original FBI letters are known here through the Committee's quotation.
The Committee's King case study records that on 21 November 1964 the FBI mailed Martin Luther King Jr. a tape with an anonymous note. King and his associates read the note as an invitation to suicide. The Committee quotes a draft supplied by the FBI and found in the office files of William Sullivan, an assistant director: "You are done. There is but one way out for you. You better take it before your filthy fraudulent self is bared to the nation." The Committee reports that Andrew Young stated the last paragraph matched the letter sent to the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (Book III, King case study, Part VI.B).
Exhibit 301 · Congressional report
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Case Study (Church Committee, Book III)
You are done. There is but one way out for you. You better take it before your filthy fraudulent self is bared to the nation.
Case study of the FBI campaign against King from December 1963 to 1968, including the November 1964 tape mailing and the draft note found in William Sullivan's office files.
- Source
- United States Senate, Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations
- Date
- 23 April 1976
- Quoted from
- Book III, MLK Case Study, Part VI.B (PDF p. 174), quoting the FBI-supplied draft letter found in Sullivan's files; the Committee says Young stated the last paragraph matched the letter sent to SCLC
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/sites-default-files-94755-iii.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
The Book III study reports that the Bureau informed no one outside the FBI of three of the programs. It also reports that no Bureau witness could recall anyone raising the legality or constitutionality of COINTELPRO, and that Attorneys General were not told of the later programs. FBI Director Clarence Kelley defended the purposes of COINTELPRO (Book III, p. 14). The Bureau ended the programs on 27 April 1971, after the 8 March 1971 burglary of its Media, Pennsylvania resident agency (Book III, p. 3 and note 1). Page numbers for Book III are derived from the PDF and should be confirmed against the printed volume.
6.2 The conclusion and the statutes
The Church Committee concluded that intelligence activities undermined citizens' constitutional rights primarily because checks and balances had not been applied. Congress then created the Senate and House intelligence committees and enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, with a seven-judge court.
The Committee's fundamental conclusion was that "intelligence activities have undermined the constitutional rights of citizens and that they have done so primarily because checks and balances designed by the framers of the Constitution to assure accountability have not been applied" (Book II, Part IV.A, p. 289). The Senate created its Select Committee on Intelligence by S. Res. 400 on 19 May 1976, by a vote of 72 to 22, and the House created its Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence by H. Res. 658 on 14 July 1977. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Pub. L. 95-511, was signed on 25 October 1978.
Evidence: Exhibit 302, Exhibit 303, Exhibit 304, Exhibit 306, Exhibit 325, Exhibit 307
The Act authorizes court orders for foreign-intelligence electronic surveillance. Section 103 provides that the Chief Justice shall designate seven district court judges to hear applications, and Section 108 requires semiannual reports to the House and Senate intelligence committees. Judicial warrants for this surveillance were among the Committee's recommendations.
Exhibit 307 · Statute
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95-511, 92 Stat. 1783
The Chief Justice of the United States shall publicly designate seven district court judges from seven of the United States judicial circuits
Authorizes court orders for foreign-intelligence electronic surveillance; Section 103 creates a seven-judge court; Section 108 requires semiannual reporting to the House and Senate intelligence committees.
- Source
- United States Congress
- Date
- 25 October 1978
- Quoted from
- 92 Stat. 1783, Sec. 103(a)
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-92/pdf/STATUTE-92-Pg1783.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
The official position
Vice Chairman John Tower, in his separate views, accepted that intelligence excesses had occurred and wrote that the 183 recommendations "not only exceed the number and scope of documented abuses, but represent over-reaction." Senator Barry Goldwater wrote that "the clamor for statutes is premature and ill-advised."
What the record shows
The Committee itself recorded "generally good cooperation" from the agencies, and assigned a major part of the blame to the failures of senior executive officials and Congress. The Senate committee followed within a month of the final report, the House committee in 1977, and FISA in 1978.
Book II contains 96 domestic recommendations, and Tower's separate views refer to 183 recommendations in all. The enactments named in Finding DEF-6.2 are the Senate and House intelligence committees and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Exhibit 303 · Congressional report
Separate Views of Senator John G. Tower, Vice Chairman (Church Committee, Book II)
I believe that the 183 separate recommendations proposing new detailed statutes and reporting procedures not only exceed the number and scope of documented abuses, but represent over-reaction.
Vice Chairman's dissent from the breadth of the recommendations.
- Source
- United States Senate
- Date
- 26 April 1976
- Quoted from
- Book II, Separate Views of Senator Tower, p. 369 (PDF p. 378)
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/sites-default-files-94755-ii.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
6.3 Iran/contra: the independent counsel
The Iran/contra affair became public after the 5 October 1986 shootdown of Eugene Hasenfus's aircraft, and the diversion of Iran arms-sale proceeds to the Contras was announced on 25 November 1986. Lawrence Walsh, appointed independent counsel, filed his Final Report on 4 August 1993.
The Independent Counsel for Iran/Contra concluded that the investigations and prosecutions had shown that high-ranking Administration officials violated laws and executive orders.
The Overall Conclusions state: "The investigations and prosecutions have shown that high-ranking Administration officials violated laws and executive orders in the Iran/contra matter." The wording on withheld documents is also in the Overall Conclusions. Both are cited by section because the HTML copy of the Final Report has no printed page numbers.
Evidence: Exhibit 308
Mechanism: Known inside, disclosed late, The filtered record
Exhibit 308 · Independent counsel report
Final Report of the Independent Counsel for Iran/Contra Matters, Vol. I
The investigations and prosecutions have shown that high-ranking Administration officials violated laws and executive orders in the Iran/contra matter.
Records the conclusions, 14 prosecutions, and the December 1992 pardons. HTML copy has no printed page numbers; locators are by section.
- Source
- Office of Independent Counsel Lawrence E. Walsh
- Date
- 4 August 1993
- Quoted from
- Executive Summary, Overall Conclusions
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
- Note
- HTML copy has no printed page numbers; locators are by section.
Walsh also recorded the Reagan Justice Department's position that the 1985 arms shipments did not violate the law. He disputed the congressional majority's account of a "cabal of zealots," and he attributed the failed North and Poindexter prosecutions to congressional grants of immunity (Final Report, Part XI). The Final Report's locators are by section because the HTML copy carries no printed page numbers.
Fourteen people were charged in the Iran/Contra prosecutions and eleven were convicted. Two convictions were vacated on appeal, and on 24 December 1992 President Bush pardoned six people, two of them before trial.
The Summary of Prosecutions states that 14 persons were charged and that eleven were convicted, "but two convictions were overturned on appeal." Those two were Oliver North and John Poindexter. One case, against Joseph Fernandez, was dismissed when classified information was withheld from trial.
Evidence: Exhibit 309, Exhibit 311, Exhibit 310, Exhibit 308
| Outcome | People | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Charged | 14 | Walsh, Summary of Prosecutions |
| Convicted | 11 | Two convictions overturned on appeal (North, Poindexter) |
| Dismissed | 1 | Fernandez, after classified information was withheld |
| Pardoned 24 December 1992 | 6 | Weinberger and Clarridge before trial; McFarlane, Abrams, George and Fiers after conviction |
The two convictions were vacated for reasons connected to the immunity that Congress had granted North and Poindexter, which Walsh named as the cause of the failed prosecutions. On 24 December 1992 President George H. W. Bush pardoned Elliott Abrams, Duane Clarridge, Alan Fiers, Clair George, Robert McFarlane and Caspar Weinberger (Proclamation 6518, 107 Stat. 2606). Weinberger and Clarridge had not been tried.
Exhibit 309 · Independent counsel report
Walsh, Summary of Prosecutions
14 persons were charged with criminal offenses. Eleven persons were convicted, but two convictions were overturned on appeal.
Per-defendant record of charges, pleas, convictions, vacatur and pardons.
- Source
- Office of Independent Counsel Lawrence E. Walsh
- Date
- 4 August 1993
- Quoted from
- Summary of Prosecutions, opening paragraph
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/summpros.htm
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
- Note
- HTML copy has no printed page numbers; locators are by section.
The official position
Bush's proclamation states: "The prosecutions of the individuals I am pardoning represent what I believe is a profoundly troubling development in the political and legal climate of our country: the criminalization of policy differences." The proclamation describes the matter as having been investigated exhaustively.
What the record shows
Walsh wrote that "The Weinberger pardon marked the first time a President ever pardoned someone in whose trial he might have been called as a witness, because the President was knowledgeable of factual events underlying the case." Walsh also reported that he found no evidence proving that Bush violated a criminal statute.
Exhibit 311 · Presidential proclamation
Proclamation 6518, Grant of Executive Clemency
The prosecutions of the individuals I am pardoning represent what I believe is a profoundly troubling development in the political and legal climate of our country: the criminalization of policy differences.
Pardons Abrams, Clarridge, Fiers, George, McFarlane and Weinberger.
- Source
- President George Bush
- Date
- 24 December 1992
- Quoted from
- 107 Stat. 2607, Proclamation 6518
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-107/pdf/STATUTE-107-Pg2606.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
Exhibit 310 · Independent counsel report
Walsh Final Report, Chapter 28, George Bush
The Weinberger pardon marked the first time a President ever pardoned someone in whose trial he might have been called as a witness, because the President was knowledgeable of factual events underlying the case.
Chapter on Bush's knowledge, his late-produced diary and the Weinberger pardon.
- Source
- Office of Independent Counsel Lawrence E. Walsh
- Date
- 4 August 1993
- Quoted from
- Chapter 28, footnote 1
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/chap_28.htm
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
- Note
- HTML copy has no printed page numbers; locators are by section.
6.4 The drug allegations and two inquiries
A Senate Foreign Relations Committee subcommittee chaired by Senator John Kerry published its report on drugs, law enforcement and foreign policy as S. Prt. 100-165 in 1989.
The Kerry subcommittee found that State Department humanitarian funds for the Contras went to four companies tied to drug traffickers, and it did not find Contra leaders personally involved in trafficking.
The report states "payments to drug traffickers by the U.S. State Department of funds authorized by the Congress for humanitarian assistance to the Contras, in some cases after the traffickers had been indicted by federal law enforcement agencies on drug charges, in others while traffickers were under active investigation" (p. 37). The report also found substantial evidence of smuggling by individual Contras, suppliers, pilots and supporters, and it did not find Contra leaders personally involved in drug trafficking.
Evidence: Exhibit 312, Exhibit 313
Exhibit 312 · Congressional report
Drugs, Law Enforcement and Foreign Policy, S. Prt. 100-165 (Kerry Committee report)
Payments to drug traffickers by the U.S. State Department of funds authorized by the Congress for humanitarian assistance to the Contras, in some cases after the traffickers had been indicted by federal law enforcement agencies on drug charges, in others while traffickers were under active investigation by these same agencies.
Subcommittee report on drug trafficking and foreign policy, including the State Department payments to four companies and the finding that Contra leaders were not found personally involved in trafficking.
- Source
- United States Senate, Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and International Operations
- Date
- 1989
- Quoted from
- S. Prt. 100-165, p. 37
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://archive.org/download/KerryCommitteeReport/Kerry%20Committee%20Report.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
| Company | Amount (USD) |
|---|---|
| SETCO | 185,924.25 |
| DIACSA | 41,120.90 |
| Frigorificos de Puntarenas | 261,932.00 |
| Vortex | 317,425.17 |
| Printed total | 806,401.20 |
The printed total is $806,401.20. The four line items on the page image sum to $806,402.32. The exhibit note records the difference of $1.12; the report does not explain it.
Exhibit 313 · Congressional report
Kerry Committee report, table of State Department payments to four suppliers
The State Department selected four companies owned and operated by narcotics traffickers to supply humanitarian assistance to the Contras.
Table lists SETCO $185,924.25; DIACSA $41,120.90; Frigorificos de Puntarenas $261,932.00; Vortex $317,425.17; printed total $806,401.20. The four line items sum to $806,402.32 (checked against the page image).
- Source
- United States Senate, Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and International Operations
- Date
- 1989
- Quoted from
- Kerry Committee report (Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Narcotics, Terrorism, and International Operations, Dec. 1988/1989 print), Part V 'U.S. Government Funds and Companies with Drug Connections', printed p. 44 (PDF p. 52)
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://archive.org/download/KerryCommitteeReport/Kerry%20Committee%20Report.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
- Note
- The four line items sum to $806,402.32, which is $1.12 more than the printed total of $806,401.20.
The CIA Inspector General found no information that the CIA or its employees conspired with Contra-related persons in drug trafficking, and found that the CIA acted inconsistently when it learned of trafficking allegations.
The CIA Inspector General's Volume II states: "No information has been found to indicate that CIA as an organization or its employees conspired with, or assisted, Contra-related organizations or individuals in drug trafficking to raise funds for the Contras or for any other purpose." The same volume concludes that "CIA acted inconsistently in handling allegations or information indicating that Contra-related organizations and individuals were involved in drug trafficking."
Evidence: Exhibit 314, Exhibit 315, Exhibit 316, Exhibit 317
Mechanism: Known inside, disclosed late
Inspector General Frederick Hitz issued Volume I on the California allegations in classified form on 17 December 1997 and in unclassified form on 29 January 1998. A team of 17 reviewed 250,000 pages and conducted more than 365 interviews. Volume I found no CIA relationship with Ross, Blandon or Meneses, and recorded a CIA cable stating that about $36,000 seized from Zavala at his arrest was returned to him by the prosecutors at the CIA's request, on the claim that the money belonged to the Contras.
Volume II, released in unclassified form on 8 October 1998, found that the CIA did not tell Congress about 8 of 10 Contra-related individuals during the fiscal year 1987 prohibition, and that 11 individuals were not reported to law enforcement. In his 16 March 1998 statement to the House intelligence committee, Hitz said six former CIA employees and a former DEA agent declined to be interviewed.
Exhibit 315 · Inspector general report
Report of Investigation, Vol. II, The Contra Story (98-0001-IG, unclassified 8 Oct 1998)
No information has been found to indicate that CIA as an organization or its employees conspired with, or assisted, Contra-related organizations or individuals in drug trafficking to raise funds for the Contras or for any other purpose.
Executive Summary and Conclusions. Volume II reviews CIA records on hundreds of Contra organizations and individuals and finds several dozen Contra-related individuals and one Contra organization (the ADREN '15th of September' group) subject to drug-trafficking allegations or information. It finds no information that CIA or its employees conspired with or assisted Contra-related drug trafficking to raise funds, and also finds that CIA acted inconsistently when it received such allegations, did not inform Congress of eight of ten Contra-related individuals during the period of the FY 1987 statutory prohibition, and had no published regulations on contacts with suspected traffickers outside counternarcotics operations. States that the investigation was not intended to prove or disprove the allegations.
- Source
- CIA Office of Inspector General
- Date
- 8 October 1998
- Quoted from
- Vol. II, Executive Summary and Conclusions, Key Findings
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://irp.fas.org/cia/product/cocaine2/intro.html
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
- Note
- Introduction: 'The investigation on which Volume II is based was not intended to prove or disprove the allegations or information received by the Agency concerning possible drug trafficking by specific individuals or organizations.' The report also states: 'No information has been found to indicate that the non-inclusion of narcotics violations by assets in the crimes reporting requirements of the 1982 DoJ-CIA MOU was intended to protect Contra activities.' The 'acted inconsistently' finding is carried by exhibit cia-oig-1998-vol2-handling. FAS copy; the original CIA reading room copy should replace it.
Exhibit 316 · Inspector general report
CIA OIG Vol. II, conclusion on handling of allegations
CIA acted inconsistently in handling allegations or information indicating that Contra-related organizations and individuals were involved in drug trafficking.
Finds CIA acted inconsistently; did not inform Congress of 8 of 10 Contra-related individuals during the FY1987 prohibition; 11 individuals not reported to law enforcement.
- Source
- CIA Office of Inspector General
- Date
- 8 October 1998
- Quoted from
- Vol. II, Conclusions, CIA Policies and Practices
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://irp.fas.org/cia/product/cocaine2/intro.html
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
Exhibit 317 · Congressional testimony
Statement of Frederick P. Hitz, Inspector General, CIA, before HPSCI
There are instances where CIA did not, in an expeditious or consistent fashion, cut off relationships with individuals supporting the Contra program who were alleged to have engaged in drug trafficking activity or take action to resolve the allegations.
Statement on Volume I; notes six former employees and a former DEA agent declined interviews; previews Volume II.
- Source
- CIA Office of Inspector General
- Date
- 16 March 1998
- Quoted from
- Statement, concluding section (Volume II preview)
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_hr/980316-ps.htm
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
6.5 BCCI
The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) pleaded guilty in 1991 and forfeited its U.S. assets. Senators Kerry and Hank Brown published the Senate Foreign Relations Committee report, S. Prt. 102-140, in December 1992.
The Senate BCCI report found that Justice Department personnel obstructed the Manhattan District Attorney's inquiry and that the CIA continued to use BCCI and First American after it knew BCCI was a criminal enterprise.
Finding 4 states that "Justice Department personnel in Washington, Miami and Tampa obstructed and impeded attempts by New York District Attorney Robert Morgenthau to obtain critical information concerning BCCI in 1989, 1990, and 1991." Finding 7 states that "After the CIA knew that BCCI was as an institution a fundamentally corrupt criminal enterprise, it continued to use both BCCI and First American, BCCI's secretly held U.S. subsidiary, for CIA operations."
Evidence: Exhibit 318, Exhibit 319, Exhibit 326
Mechanism: The filtered record, Known inside, disclosed late
Exhibit 318 · Congressional report
The BCCI Affair, S. Prt. 102-140 (Kerry and Brown)
Justice Department personnel in Washington, Miami and Tampa obstructed and impeded attempts by New York District Attorney Robert Morgenthau to obtain critical information concerning BCCI in 1989, 1990, and 1991, and in one case, a federal prosecutor lied to Morgenthau's office concerning the existence of such material.
Executive Summary, Findings 4 and 7 on Justice Department handling and the CIA.
- Source
- United States Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations
- Date
- December 1992
- Quoted from
- Executive Summary, Finding 4
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
Exhibit 319 · Congressional report
The BCCI Affair, Finding 7 (CIA)
After the CIA knew that BCCI was as an institution a fundamentally corrupt criminal enterprise, it continued to use both BCCI and First American, BCCI's secretly held U.S. subsidiary, for CIA operations.
CIA knowledge of BCCI by early 1985 and continued use of BCCI and First American.
- Source
- United States Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations
- Date
- December 1992
- Quoted from
- Executive Summary, Finding 7
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/01exec.htm
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
Kerr, the CIA's witness, testified on 25 October 1991 that the CIA had not violated any law and had no relationship with BCCI founder Agha Hasan Abedi. The Committee found that the CIA's first information to it was "untrue," and later "incomplete." A September 1995 Justice Department release reported that a federal court had released more than $393 million of the funds forfeited in 1992, including $223 million for a victims' fund and $10 million for New York.
Exhibit 326 · Agency press release
Federal Court Releases $393 Million for BCCI Victims (DOJ press release #465)
The order marks the first time that the funds forfeited in 1992 are being made available to the government and the worldwide victims' fund under a plea agreement by the bank in 1991.
Reports the 1991 plea agreement by BCCI, the 1992 forfeiture order, and release of more than $393 million, $223 million to a victims' fund and $10 million to New York.
- Source
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Date
- 1 September 1995
- Quoted from
- DOJ press release 95-465, paragraph 2
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/Pre_96/September95/465.txt.html
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
6.6 The 28 pages
The Joint Inquiry of the House and Senate intelligence committees into the 11 September 2001 attacks published its report in December 2002. The Executive Branch withheld Part Four, "Finding, Discussion and Narrative Regarding Certain Sensitive National Security Matters," in full. Portions were declassified on 15 July 2016, with redactions. No body listed here concluded that the U.S. government carried out or assisted the attacks. Part Four concerns possible Saudi-linked contacts with the hijackers.
Part Four of the 2002 Joint Inquiry report, commonly called the 28 pages, was withheld in full until 15 July 2016. It reports leads about Saudi-linked contacts with the hijackers, and the Inquiry stated it made no final determinations.
Part Four reports leads about Saudi-linked contacts with the hijackers. The ODNI statement of 15 July 2016 reports that the Joint Inquiry "has made no final determinations" and that release "is not an endorsement of, or concurrence in, its accuracy or reliability."
Evidence: Exhibit 320, Exhibit 322
Mechanism: Known inside, disclosed late
The finding is graded reported because the ODNI statement is known through a trade-news reprint. Part Four states on printed page 421: "It should be clear that this Joint Inquiry has made no final determinations as to the reliability or sufficiency of the information regarding these issues that we found contained in FBI and CIA documents." The FBI's November 2002 response in Part Four states that there was no evidence that Omar al-Bayoumi was an intelligence officer, and the same part records inconsistencies elsewhere in the Bureau's accounts (pp. 424–426).
Exhibit 320 · Congressional report
Joint Inquiry report, Part Four: Finding, Discussion and Narrative Regarding Certain Sensitive National Security Matters (declassified in part 15 July 2016)
It should be clear that this Joint Inquiry has made no final determinations as to the reliability or sufficiency of the information regarding these issues that we found contained in FBI and CIA documents.
Part Four of the Joint Inquiry report, pages 415-443; finding 20 is on its opening page. Committee-hosted scan of the declassified text. Part Four states that the Inquiry 'has made no final determinations' on the reliability or sufficiency of the FBI and CIA information it found, and presents the Saudi-linked connections, including one sentence from a redacted source dated 2 July 2002 that uses the words 'incontrovertible evidence', alongside 'legitimate, and innocent, explanations'.
- Source
- U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
- Date
- December 2002 (declassified 15 July 2016)
- Quoted from
- Joint Inquiry report, Part Four, printed p. 421, first full paragraph (34-page scan; checked against the page image)
- Grade
- Reported
- Document
- https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/declasspart4.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
- Note
- The 15 July 2016 declassification date is not in the document; it comes from the ODNI statement (odni-2016-part4-statement).
Exhibit 322 · Agency statement
ODNI statement on declassification of Part Four of the 2002 Joint Inquiry report
The decision to authorize the release of this information is not an endorsement of, or concurrence in, its accuracy or reliability.
The ODNI original on dni.gov should replace it. States Part Four was withheld in full in 2002, that the Executive Branch released portions in 2016 with redactions, and that release is not an endorsement of accuracy; cites the 9/11 Commission and the 2013-directed FBI 9/11 Review Commission.
- Source
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence
- Date
- 15 July 2016
- Quoted from
- ODNI statement, 15 July 2016, paragraph 1 (as reprinted)
- Grade
- Reported
- Document
- https://intelligencecommunitynews.com/odni-issues-statement-on-declassification-of-part-four-of-hpsci-and-sscis-2002-joint-inquiry-report/
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
- Note
- Known through a trade-news reprint.
The 9/11 Commission found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded al Qaeda.
The 9/11 Commission Report states: "we have found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization" (p. 171). It saw no credible evidence that Bayoumi knowingly aided extremists.
Evidence: Exhibit 321, Exhibit 323, Exhibit 324
The ODNI release also cited the FBI 9/11 Review Commission, directed in 2013, which found no new evidence changing the 9/11 Commission's findings on responsibility. A joint FBI–CIA assessment dated 1 September 2005, declassified in 2016, found no evidence that the Saudi government or members of the royal family knowingly provided support for the attacks. The same assessment found evidence that official Saudi entities and associated nongovernmental organizations had funded individuals tied to terrorism, and it found no information that Bayoumi or Osama Basnan wittingly supported the hijackers.
News coverage of the FBI records released on 11 September 2021 reports that they describe Omar al-Bayoumi's assistance and the contacts of Fahad al-Thumairy, and that they do not state that the Saudi government was complicit. Attorneys for victims' families argue that the records support their claims against Saudi Arabia.
Exhibit 321 · Commission report
The 9/11 Commission Report
we have found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization.
Chapter 5 on funding and chapter 7 on Bayoumi.
- Source
- National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
- Date
- 22 July 2004
- Quoted from
- 9/11 Commission Report, p. 171
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-911REPORT/pdf/GPO-911REPORT.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
- Note
- Further quotation: “We believe the 9/11 attacks revealed four kinds of failures: in imagination, policy, capabilities, and management.” (Chapter 11, Foresight—and Hindsight, opening section, printed p. 339 (PDF p. 357)). Further quotation: “The current position of Director of Central Intelligence should be replaced by a National Intelligence Director with two main areas of responsibility” (Chapter 13, How To Do It?, recommendation, printed p. 411 (PDF p. 429)). The sentence continues '(1) to oversee national intelligence centers on specific subjects of interest across the U.S. government and (2) to manage the national intelligence program and oversee the agencies that contribute to it.'
Exhibit 323 · Intelligence community assessment
Executive Summary, joint FBI-CIA report on the nature and extent of Saudi Government support for terrorism (cover letters 1 September 2005; declassified 15 July 2016)
There is no evidence that either the Saudi Government or members of the Saudi royal family knowingly provided support for the attacks of 11 September 2001
Executive summary released by ODNI in 2016. Finds no evidence the Saudi government or royal family knowingly supported the attacks, evidence that official Saudi entities and associated NGOs funded individuals tied to terrorism, and no information that al-Bayoumi or Basnan wittingly supported the hijackers.
- Source
- FBI and CIA
- Date
- 1 September 2005
- Quoted from
- Executive Summary, first bullet (OCR of scan; recheck against official copy)
- Grade
- Reported
- Document
- https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/terrorism/Executive_Summary_of_Joint_FBI-CIA_Report_on_Extent_of_Saudi_Government_Support_for_Terrorism.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
Exhibit 324 · Declassified agency record
FBI 9/11 document release no. 1, 16-page investigative record on Saudi-linked contacts (11 September 2021)
BAYOUMI’s logistic support to HAZMI and MIDHAR included translation, travel assistance, lodging and financing.
Per the coverage, the heavily redacted record describes assistance by Omar al-Bayoumi and contacts of Fahad al-Thumairy and does not state that the Saudi government was complicit.
- Source
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Date
- 11 September 2021
- Quoted from
- FBI Electronic Communication of 4 Apr. 2016 (Operation Encore), printed p. 8, first paragraph (PDF p. 9)
- Grade
- Reported
- Document
- https://vault.fbi.gov/9-11-attacks-investigation-and-related-materials/9-11-material-released-in-response-to-executive-order-14040/april-4-2016-electronic-communication-part-01-of-01/at_download/file
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
6.7 Journalists and books
The Church Committee's Book I reports on covert relationships between the CIA and the American press. The Committee's own section heading is "Covert Relationships with the United States Media." The CIA announced a new policy toward accredited media correspondents on 11 February 1976.
The Church Committee found that until February 1976 the CIA kept covert relationships with about 50 American journalists or employees of U.S. media organizations, and that it produced, subsidized or sponsored more than a thousand books before the end of 1967.
Book I states: "Until February 1976, when it announced a new policy toward U.S. media personnel, the CIA maintained covert relationships with about 50 American journalists or employees of U.S. media organizations" (p. 192). About half were paid, and fewer than half would be ended under the new policy. The Committee also found that the CIA produced, subsidized or sponsored well over a thousand books before the end of 1967.
Evidence: Exhibit 305
Mechanism: Managing the narrative
Exhibit 305 · Congressional report
Foreign and Military Intelligence (Church Committee, Book I), S. Rep. 94-755: Covert Relationships with the United States Media
Until February 1976, when it announced a new policy toward U.S. media personnel, the CIA maintained covert relationships with about 50 American journalists or employees of U.S. media organizations.
Documents about 50 CIA relationships with U.S. journalists or media employees as of February 1976, the CIA's February 1976 policy, more than a thousand books produced or subsidized before 1967, and CIA acknowledgement that propaganda 'fallout' in the United States cannot be prevented.
- Source
- United States Senate, Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations
- Date
- 26 April 1976
- Quoted from
- Book I, Part B, Covert Relationships with the United States Media, p. 192 (PDF p. 195)
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/sites-default-files-94755-i.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-09
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
The Committee noted that most of the media contacts were bona fide journalists who were witting, while their organizations mostly were not aware of the arrangements. The CIA said that propaganda "fallout" in the United States could not be prevented. Book II separately records that the FBI fed derogatory material about its targets to "friendly" media.
6.8 The interrogation videotapes
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence's 2014 study of the CIA's detention and interrogation program states that Senator Levin's proposal for an independent commission "resulted in concern at the CIA that such a commission would lead to the discovery of videotapes documenting CIA interrogations," that this concern "prompted renewed interest at the CIA to destroy the videotapes," that Levin's amendment failed on 8 November 2005, and that the CIA destroyed the interrogation videotapes the following day.
The Committee's study of the CIA program grew out of its investigation into the 2005 destruction of the interrogation videotapes. The passage is in section E of the executive summary, titled "Proposal from Senator Levin for an Independent Commission Prompts Renewed Calls Within the CIA to Destroy Interrogation Videotapes", on pages 443 and 444.
Evidence: Exhibit 930
Mechanism: The study not run
A footnote to that passage quotes a CIA email of 31 October 2005 from John Rizzo: "Sen. Levin's legislative proposal for a 9/11-type outside Commission to be established on detainees seems to be gaining some traction, which obviously would serve to surface the tapes' existence." Rizzo then wrote that he needed to see "if the Director is willing to let us try one more time to get the right people downtown on board with the notion of our [sic] destroying the tapes." A senior CIA attorney who had viewed the tapes replied: "You are correct. The sooner we resolve this the better."
The Committee presents these emails as the CIA's own record of its reasoning. The executive summary also describes the CIA's proposed redactions to the public text of the study in a footnote on page 10. This section covers the summary's account of the sequence in November 2005 and does not cover the later Justice Department inquiry into the destruction.
Exhibit 930 · Congressional report
Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency's Detention and Interrogation Program: Foreword, Findings and Conclusions, and Executive Summary, S. Rpt. 113-288
a proposal from Senator Carl Levin to establish an independent commission to investigate U.S. detention policies and allegations of detainee abuse resulted in concern at the CIA that such a commission would lead to the discovery of videotapes documenting CIA interrogations. That concern prompted renewed interest at the CIA to destroy the videotapes.
The declassified executive summary of the Committee's study of the CIA program, with the Chairman's foreword and findings. It records that the study grew out of an investigation into the CIA's 2005 destruction of the interrogation videotapes. Section E on pages 443 and 444 states that Senator Levin's proposal for an independent commission prompted CIA concern that a commission would discover the videotapes, that the concern prompted renewed interest in destroying them, that Levin's amendment failed on 8 November 2005, and that the CIA destroyed the tapes the next day. Footnote 2488 quotes a CIA email of 31 October 2005 and a senior CIA attorney's reply. The CIA's proposed redactions to the public text are described in footnote 6 on page 10.
- Source
- United States Senate, Select Committee on Intelligence
- Date
- 9 December 2014
- Quoted from
- Executive Summary, Findings and Conclusions, section E, p. 443 (of 499); the sentence dating the destruction is at p. 444: "Senator Levin's amendment to establish the commission failed on November 8, 2005. The CIA destroyed the CIA interrogation videotapes the following day."
- Grade
- Primary record
- Document
- https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-113srpt288/pdf/CRPT-113srpt288.pdf
- Accessed
- 2026-11-10
- Cited by
- Findings citing this exhibit
6.9 Scope and open items
Chapter 12 of the Medicine report, Military Exposures, covers MKULTRA.
The FBI Vault documents of 2021 and 2022 are reported through news coverage, and the 2021 release is cited as an exhibit to DEF-6.9 on that basis.
Key findings
- The FBI approved 2,370 COINTELPRO actions between 1956 and 1971 (6.1).
- The Church Committee blamed unapplied checks and balances, and Congress created permanent oversight and the FISA court (6.2).
- The Iran/contra independent counsel found that high-ranking officials violated laws and executive orders (6.3).
- Of 14 people charged, 11 were convicted, two convictions were vacated and six people were pardoned (6.4).
- State Department funds went to four firms tied to drug traffickers; the Kerry report did not find Contra leaders personally involved (6.5).
- The CIA Inspector General found no CIA conspiracy and inconsistent handling of allegations (6.6).
- The Senate found Justice Department obstruction and continued CIA use of BCCI (6.7).
- The 28 pages state leads and no final determinations; the 9/11 Commission found no evidence of Saudi government funding (6.8, 6.9).
- The CIA kept about 50 covert relationships with American journalists and media employees and sponsored over a thousand books (6.10).
- The Senate's study states that CIA concern that a commission would discover its interrogation videotapes prompted renewed interest in destroying them, and that the CIA destroyed them the day after the commission amendment failed (6.11).